ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
Exploring Hospital Healthcare Providers' Approaches to Multidisciplinary Initiatives and Complex Care Collaboration: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Factors Influencing Perceived Multidisciplinary Team Meeting Effectiveness in Teams Addressing Work-Related Respiratory Diseases: A Qualitative Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite well-documented factors influencing collaboration, healthcare providers' perspectives remain limited. These perspectives are key for understanding how they manage complex patient care effectively. This study explores hospital healthcare providers' views on multidisciplinary collaboration and their openness to an intervention for managing complex care in patients with diabetes and multiple chronic conditions. Methods: An interview study. The Interpretive Description approach was employed as the research methodology, with Boundary Work as the analytical framework. Purposive sampling was utilised, with data consisting of 22 semi-structured, face-to-face individual and two focus group interviews with nurses, junior physicians, and physicians at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. Results: Three main themes emerged: Wide Support and Need for Multidisciplinary Collaboration; Existing Collaboration Between Clinics - and Their Limitations; and Introducing a Collaborative Initiative: the Intervention. The informants agreed that collaboration and coordination - both broadly and in relation to the specific intervention - are important and could improve care coordination, enhance patients' sense of security, clarify professional roles, enrich expertise, and streamline resource use. However, organisational structures and professional dynamics often hinder such efforts. A key challenge related to the intervention was identifying patients with complex cases for referral. Conclusion: This study highlights hospital healthcare providers' recognition of the critical need to strengthen collaboration across specialties to manage complex cases effectively. Significant barriers, such as siloed specialisation and heavy workloads, call for targeted political and managerial action. Challenges in identifying complex cases point to the need for methods that adopt a holistic, patient-centred approach to gain a nuanced understanding of the challenges individuals face in living with multiple chronic conditions and receiving care across different hospital clinics. In the future, this approach could streamline the referral of complex cases, with additional research required to explore the potential of flexible multidisciplinary team meetings in enhancing collaboration within complex care pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.