ReviewJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2025
Ethical considerations in shoulder arthroplasty in patients who are obese.
Review in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obesity and osteoarthritis are two of the most common conditions in the United States and often co-occur. Obese patients with osteoarthritis are at increased risk for complications when undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The ethical consideration relevant to the decision to perform TSA in obese and morbidly obese patients who may benefit from surgery is not well understood. We performed an ethical analysis for patients undergoing TSA who are obese by analyzing the 4 core bioethical principles, beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice. To provide the most benefit to patients, counseling patients on weight loss before surgery should be attempted including bariatric surgery or weight loss medication in select patients. To respect the ethical principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence, the surgeon must carefully weigh the potential for debilitating progression of disease, pain, and the psychological toll of osteoarthritis against the concern that obese patients may have a higher risk of complications. Respecting patient autonomy requires a rigorous, standardized consent process, which is informed by an understanding of common cognitive biases that affect patient understanding and minimization of perverse incentives that make it more difficult for the surgeon to spend adequate time and resources counseling the patient. Improving incentives for hospitals and physician alike to treat patients with obesity and other comorbidities will provide most just care while minimizing long-term harmful effects to the patient, surgeon, and health-care system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.