ArticleJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2025
Independent third row augmentation of massive rotator cuff repairs: surgical technique with radiological and patient outcomes.
Article in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Primary repair of massive posterosuperior rotator cuff is challenging with a high rate of failure. This study details the technique and outcomes of a standard double-row cuff repair augmented with a synthetic ligament inserted in a separate adjacent location from the tendon-bone construct to off-load and de-tension the repair interface. Methods: Eleven patients with massive rotator cuff tears involving two or more tendons with >2.5 cm of retraction were prospectively enrolled. All patients underwent arthroscopically assisted mini-open double-row repair. This was augmented by a synthetic ligament passed medially through the supraspinatus and infraspinatus musculotendinous junctions before fixation distal to the second-row anchors. This represents a third row of repair that is remote from the double-row construct and aims to minimize repair tension. The primary outcome was repair integrity according to the Sugaya classification on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Secondary outcomes included the Constant score, EQ-5D 3L, and Oxford Shoulder Scores. Results: The mean patient age was 65 with 10 males. At a mean follow-up of 13 months, 8 (73%) of the repaired tendons were intact on magnetic resonance imaging. Of the 3 retears, one occurred at the musculotendinous junction. All outcome scores were significantly improved after surgery beyond the minimal clinically important difference. Conclusion: The insertion of an independent third row to off-load a standard rotator cuff repair construct resulted in favorable healing rates in patients with massive cuff tears. The technique is a simple, time-efficient method of de-tensioning the repair of massive rotator cuff tears.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.