ArticlePeerJ2025
Preoperative prediction of p16 expression in cervical cancer by amide proton transfer imaging combined with diffusion kurtosis imaging: a retrospective study.
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Immunohistochemical p16 expression is important for the assessment of risk factors and prognosis of cervical cancer. This study evaluated the correlation between preoperative amide proton transfer imaging (APT), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), and p16 expression in cervical cancer. Methods: Fifty-five records of patients with cervical cancer with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and complete postoperative pathology were retrospectively analyzed. Uterine MRI scans were examined, and the corresponding APT values, mean kurtosis (MK), and mean diffusivity (MD) were obtained. Pathology was used to determine p16 positivity. The predictive effects of the APT- and DKI-derived parameters applied alone or in combination with p16 expression were compared. Results: Among the 55 cases of cervical cancer, 35 were p16 positive and 20 were p16 negative. The receiver operating characteristic curve area (AUC) of p16 was 0.809, 0.801, 0.790, 0.845, 0.866, and 0.871 when APT, MK, and MD were used individually and then jointly. The effect of APT combined with the DKI derivative parameters was more pronounced than when they were used separately. Conclusion: Preoperative APT and DKI imaging are valuable in predicting the expression of p16 in cervical cancer, and the combination of the two can improve the prediction efficacy. These findings could help to guide treatment decisions and determine prognosis in cervical cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.