Trial reportPeerJ2025
The efficacy of pre-operative oral aceclofenac and intra-ligamentary mepivacaine on the success of failed inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a prospective, randomised, double-blinded clinical trial.
Trial report in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug to improve inferior alveolar nerve block success in irreversible pulpitis: A bibliometric analysis.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to compare the effects of oral pre-operative aceclofenac and supplemental intra-ligamentary mepivacaine and articaine injection on the anaesthetic efficacy of failed inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular molars. Materials and Methods: A total of 126 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were selected for the study intervention. The study design was a prospective, randomised, double-blinded clinical trial. Pre-operative medication was administered 15 minutes before the patients received the standard IANB. Subsequently, the endodontic therapy was started. Pain felt at any time during the procedure was recorded on a 170 mm Heft-Parker visual analogue scale (VAS), and a supplemental intra-ligamentary injection was administered. Based on the pre-operative medication and the intra-ligamentary injection received, the patients were categorized into the following four groups: two groups received 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine as an intra-ligamentary injection with or without aceclofenac as the pre-operative medication (Group 1 and Group 2, respectively), and two other groups received 3% plain mepivacaine with or without aceclofenac (Group 3 and Group 4, respectively). The VAS scores were determined pre-operatively, following access preparation and/or instrumentation within the dentin, the pulpal space, and the instrumentation of canals. Data were analyzed using Pearson's chi-square test and independent Results: Concerning the supplemental intra-ligamentary injection, 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine showed a higher success rate than 3% plain mepivacaine, irrespective of the pre-operative medication used, and the difference was statistically significant ( Conclusions: In patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis of mandibular molars, an intraligamentary injection of 4% articaine combined with 1:100,000 epinephrine can significantly aid in achieving anesthesia in situations where primary IANB is unsuccessful. Clinical Relevance: Mandibular molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis are associated with a high anaesthetic failure rate of a single primary IANB injection during endodontic treatment. Adding an oral pre-operative aceclofenac medication and a supplemental intra-ligamentary injection, augments the anaesthetic efficacy in such cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.