Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40321815›Full record

Trial reportPeerJ2025

The efficacy of pre-operative oral aceclofenac and intra-ligamentary mepivacaine on the success of failed inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a prospective, randomised, double-blinded clinical trial.

Susmita Ghosh, Paras Mull Gehlot, Ganesh Jadhav, Annapoorna Ballagere Mariswamy, Karkala Venkappa Kishan, Ahmed Al Malwi, Shahabe Saquib Abullais

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Susmita GhoshDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, JSS Dental College and Hospital, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Maysore, Karnataka, India.
Paras Mull GehlotDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, JSS Dental College and Hospital, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Maysore, Karnataka, India.
Ganesh JadhavDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Annapoorna Ballagere MariswamyDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, JSS Dental College and Hospital, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Maysore, Karnataka, India.
Karkala Venkappa KishanSrinivas Institute of Dental Sciences, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.
Ahmed Al MalwiDepartment of Restorative Dental Science, King Khalid University, Abha, Aseer, Saudi Arabia.
Shahabe Saquib AbullaisDepartment of Periodontics and Community Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare the effects of oral pre-operative aceclofenac and supplemental intra-ligamentary mepivacaine and articaine injection on the anaesthetic efficacy of failed inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular molars. Materials and Methods: A total of 126 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were selected for the study intervention. The study design was a prospective, randomised, double-blinded clinical trial. Pre-operative medication was administered 15 minutes before the patients received the standard IANB. Subsequently, the endodontic therapy was started. Pain felt at any time during the procedure was recorded on a 170 mm Heft-Parker visual analogue scale (VAS), and a supplemental intra-ligamentary injection was administered. Based on the pre-operative medication and the intra-ligamentary injection received, the patients were categorized into the following four groups: two groups received 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine as an intra-ligamentary injection with or without aceclofenac as the pre-operative medication (Group 1 and Group 2, respectively), and two other groups received 3% plain mepivacaine with or without aceclofenac (Group 3 and Group 4, respectively). The VAS scores were determined pre-operatively, following access preparation and/or instrumentation within the dentin, the pulpal space, and the instrumentation of canals. Data were analyzed using Pearson's chi-square test and independent Results: Concerning the supplemental intra-ligamentary injection, 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine showed a higher success rate than 3% plain mepivacaine, irrespective of the pre-operative medication used, and the difference was statistically significant ( Conclusions: In patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis of mandibular molars, an intraligamentary injection of 4% articaine combined with 1:100,000 epinephrine can significantly aid in achieving anesthesia in situations where primary IANB is unsuccessful. Clinical Relevance: Mandibular molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis are associated with a high anaesthetic failure rate of a single primary IANB injection during endodontic treatment. Adding an oral pre-operative aceclofenac medication and a supplemental intra-ligamentary injection, augments the anaesthetic efficacy in such cases.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, LocalAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDiclofenacMepivacaineNerve BlockPulpitisAdministration, OralAdultCarticaineDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMandibular NerveMiddle AgedMolaraceclofenacAnesthetics, LocalAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCarticaineDiclofenacMepivacaineAceclofenacArticaineFailed inferior alveolar nerve blockIntra-ligamentary injectionMepivacaineSymptomatic irreversible pulpitis

Identifiers

PMID40321815
PMCPMC12049097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.