ArticleClinical and experimental vaccine research2025
Protective antibody response in Korean raccoon dogs (
Article in Clinical and experimental vaccine research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel Thermostabilizing Formulation for Enhanced Stability of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus During Storage and Environmental Stress.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Rabies and Pinnipeds Reviewed: Premonitions, Perturbations, and Projections?Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Rabies is a deadly zoonotic disease affecting many mammals, including humans. Oral rabies bait vaccines induce an immune response without direct inoculation, and are crucial for controlling rabies in wildlife. This study evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of a new rabies bait vaccine containing a recombinant rabies virus expressing green fluorescent protein (ERAGS-GFP) in wild raccoon dogs. Materials and Methods: To confirm the safety of the ERAGS-GFP vaccine, reversion to virulence was evaluated in 1-day-old suckling mice. The uptake, minimum effective dose, and immunogenicity of the bait vaccine were assessed in raccoon dogs, as was the persistence of post-vaccine immunity. Serum rabies virus neutralizing antibody (VNA) titers were measured using fluorescent antibody virus neutralization. Results: No adverse effects were noted in mice, guinea pigs, dogs, or raccoon dogs administered the ERAGS-GFP vaccine orally during the test period. The glycoprotein gene of the ERAGS-GFP strain remained unchanged after five reverse passages in 1-day-old mice. Uptake of the bait vaccine was 75.8% in raccoon dogs. The minimum effective dose was at least 10 Conclusion: The ERAGS-GFP bait vaccine showed high uptake and strong immunogenicity in raccoon dogs, and protective antibody levels were maintained for at least 4 months. These results indicate the vaccine's potential for effective rabies control in wildlife, which can reduce the risk of transmission to humans and domestic animals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.