ArticleHeart rhythm O22025
Contrastive pretraining improves deep learning classification of endocardial electrograms in a preclinical model.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Self-supervised contrastive learning enables robust electrocardiogram-based cardiac classification.Heart rhythm O2 · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rotors and focal ectopies, or "drivers," are hypothesized mechanisms of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Machine learning algorithms have been used to identify these drivers, but the limited size of current driver data sets constrains their performance. Objective: We proposed that pretraining using unsupervised learning on a substantial data set of unlabeled electrograms could enhance classifier accuracy when applied to a smaller driver data set. Methods: We used a SimCLR-based framework to pretrain a residual neural network on 113,000 unlabeled 64-electrode measurements from a canine model of AF. The network was then fine-tuned to identify drivers from intracardiac electrograms. Various augmentations, including cropping, Gaussian blurring, and rotation, were applied during pretraining to improve the robustness of the learned representations. Results: Pretraining significantly improved driver detection accuracy compared with a non-pretrained network (80.8% vs 62.5%). The pretrained network also demonstrated greater resilience to reductions in training data set size, maintaining higher accuracy even with a 30% reduction in data. Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping analysis revealed that the network's attention aligned well with manually annotated driver regions, suggesting that the network learned meaningful features for driver detection. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that contrastive pretraining can enhance the accuracy of driver detection algorithms in AF. The findings support the broader application of transfer learning to other electrogram-based tasks, potentially improving outcomes in clinical electrophysiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.