Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40321743›Full record

ArticleHeart rhythm O22025

Correlation between mobile and 12-lead ECG among patients loading with intravenous sotalol: A PEAKS substudy.

Benjamin A Steinberg, Suneet Mittal, Richard Holubkov, Christopher A Groh, Robert Kennedy, Parash Pokharel, Marco Perez, Salvatore J Savona, Nishant Verma, Kevin Watt and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05247320 (Prospective Evaluation Analysis and Kinetics of IV Sotalol), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05247320 completednot on this map

Prospective Evaluation Analysis and Kinetics of IV Sotalol

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2022 to 2023Enrolled167ConditionsAtrial ArrhythmiaArmsSotalol Injection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Benjamin A SteinbergDepartment of Medicine, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, Colorado.
Suneet MittalValley Health, Paramus, New Jersey.
Richard HolubkovData Coordinating Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Christopher A GrohDepartment of Medicine, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Robert KennedyMunson Healthcare, Traverse City, Michigan.
Parash PokharelGeisinger Health, Danville, Pennsylvania.
Marco PerezStanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Salvatore J SavonaOhio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Nishant VermaNorthwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Kevin WattData Coordinating Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Jonathan P PicciniDuke University Medical Center and the Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
T Jared BunchDepartment of Medicine, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Thomas F DeeringPiedmont Heart Institute, Atlanta, Georgia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Electrocardiographic monitoring is performed during sotalol loading, primarily to assess QTc. Continuous telemetry increases resource utilization, generating interest in streamlining QTc monitoring through mobile technologies. Objective: Assess feasibility and outcomes of mobile electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring during intravenous sotalol loading. Methods: In a substudy of the PEAKS (Prospective Evaluation Analysis and Kinetics of IV Sotalol) registry, AliveCor 6L mobile ECGs were recorded during intravenous sotalol loading, concomitantly with standard 12-lead ECGs. We calculated the correlation of heart rate and QTc between them. Results: Overall, 77 patients were included: the median age was 68 years (interquartile range 63-73 years) and 20% were female. A total of 227 mobile recordings were performed within 30 minutes of 12-lead ECG, including baseline (8%), during infusion (54%), during oral dosing (35%), and during follow-up (0.4%). Half (51%) of 12-lead tracings were in atrial tachycardia (AT)/atrial fibrillation (AF), with a 93% correlation with automated mobile diagnostics. No mobile QTc values were available for recordings in AT/AF. The overall correlation between 12-lead ECG and mobile ECG was good for continuous heart rate (R > 0.8) but was poor for continuous QTc (R = 0.24). Most physiologic QTc values from the mobile ECGs were within 10% of the adjudicated 12-lead values (83%), with 53% within 5%. There were few false negative values for QTc >500 ms by mobile ECG (n = 2 of 58 [3.4%]). Conclusion: Mobile ECGs can be performed during sotalol loading but are limited by the absence of QTc in AT/AF. While QTc values from automated mobile 6-lead ECGs appeared to detect cases of QTc prolongation in sinus rhythm, additional data are needed prior to use for routine clinical monitoring. ClinicalTrialsgov ID: NCT05247320.

Indexed as

Antiarrhythmic drugsAtrial fibrillationIntravenous sotalolMobile electrocardiographyQT prolongationRegistry

Identifiers

PMID40321743
PMCPMC12047594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.