ArticleHeart rhythm O22025
Premature ventricular contraction detection and estimation of daily burden by an insertable cardiac monitor.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Premature ventricular contraction (PVC) burden is a clinically important metric in the context of PVC-induced cardiomyopathy and is commonly obtained via ambulatory electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring. Objective: The purpose of this analysis is to characterize the performance of a novel PVC detection algorithm capable of identifying single PVCs and PVC sequences (couplets and triplets) for estimation of 24-hour PVC burden in an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM). Methods: Performance of the ICM algorithm for detecting PVCs was validated by replaying 748 patient-triggered ICM-recorded ECG episodes from 184 patients through the ICM device. To assess performance over longer ambulatory periods, a validated software model equivalent of the implemented ICM algorithm was evaluated against a 24-hour Holter dataset of 89 patients. The model also was used to evaluate performance on an established reference library from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Beth Israel Hospital (MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database) as a basis of comparison with other published algorithms. Results: Beat-level validation on the ICM-stored episode dataset yielded a gross PVC sensitivity of 80.1% with a specificity of 99.7%. The correlation between 24-hour Holter burden and ICM algorithm PVC burden was Conclusion: The ICM algorithm reliably detects PVCs with high sensitivity and specificity. Twenty-four-hour PVC burden measurements demonstrated a strong correlation with a gold standard 12-lead Holter and may provide utility for identifying patients at risk for worsening left ventricular function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.