ArticleHeart rhythm O22025
Permanent pacemaker insertion for bradyarrhythmias in a secondary health facility in sub-Saharan Africa.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of lead placement site on right ventricular function: a comparative echocardiographic analysis of apical versus septal pacing in permanent pacemaker recipients.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Permanent cardiac pacemaker (PPM) insertion has been used clinically since 1960. It is a lifesaving procedure in symptomatic bradyarrhythmia. The experience of PPM implantation in non-Western countries has not been well characterized. Objective: This study reports our experience in pacemaker insertion in the newly remodeled District General Hospital Awa. The Akwa Ibom state government fully sponsored the procedures with state funds; otherwise, patients would have to pay out of pocket. Methods: The general hospital is fully equipped with an ultramodern theater with C-arm fluoroscopy and audiovisual facilities, and there is an anteroom in the procedural suite where people can watch for virtual learning. This is the first of its kind. Results: A single-chamber (VVIR) pacemaker was implanted in all patients. There were no acute complications postsurgery. All patients were followed for at least 3 months. There were no deaths reported at the 3-month follow-up. Device interrogations were performed at the 3-month follow-up visit, and device parameters were all stable with excellent sensing thresholds. Routine follow-up for our center is a regular 2-monthly follow-up in the first year. Conclusion: We conclude that permanent pacemakers can be safely carried out in a well-equipped district general hospital. Most needy patients are likely older, with complete heart block as the commonest indication. However, government and/or nongovernmental organizations need health insurance or subsidization to make it sustainable in low-income countries to which Nigeria belongs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.