ArticleHeart rhythm O22025
Clinical outcomes of cases requiring touch-up applications in pulmonary vein isolation with balloon ablation.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Balloon ablation for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a well-established treatment option for atrial fibrillation. Although some patients require touch-up ablation, generalizable evidence is limited. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the current status and outcomes of touch-up applications using a nationwide registry in Japan. Methods: Patients ≥18 years of age who underwent first-time PVI between January 2017 and December 2020 were included using the data from the Japanese Catheter Ablation registry. The annual trends in the proportion of cases requiring touch-up ablation with radiofrequency ablation were determined, and the associations of ablation strategies with acute success and periprocedural complications were analyzed using logistic regression analysis. Results: Of the 51,402 patients included, 28,412 and 22,990 patients underwent PVI using radiofrequency ablation and balloon ablation, respectively. In the balloon ablation group, 1462 (6.4%) patients required touch-up applications, and the proportion of cases requiring touch-up applications decreased during the study period from 9.5% in 2017 to 5.5% in 2020 ( Conclusion: Touch-up applications following balloon ablation are required in some cases. Touch-up ablation with radiofrequency ablation may be a treatment option when achieving successful PVI using balloon ablation is difficult.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.