Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40321674›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in urology

Diagnosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma via a deep learning model with whole-slide images.

Weixing Jiang, Siyu Qi, Cancan Chen, Wenying Wang, Xi Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Weixing JiangDepartment of Urology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3844-2045
Siyu QiDepartment of Urology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Cancan ChenSchool of Computer Engineering, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang, China.
Wenying WangDepartment of Urology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, Yangan Road 95#, Xicheng District 100050, China.
Xi ChenDepartment of Urology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, Panjiayuan Nanli 17#, Chaoyang District 100021, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Traditional pathological diagnosis methods have limitations in terms of interobserver variability and the time consumption of evaluations. In this study, we explored the feasibility of using whole-slide images (WSIs) to establish a deep learning model for the diagnosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Methods: We retrospectively collected pathological data from 95 patients with ccRCC from January 2023 to December 2023. All pathological slices conforming to the standards of the model were manually annotated first. The WSIs were preprocessed to extract the region of interest. The WSIs were divided into a training set and a test set, and the ratio of tumor slices to normal tissue slices in the training set to the test set was 3:1. Positive and negative samples were randomly extracted. Model training was based on a convolutional neural network (CNN) and a random forest model. The accuracy of the model was evaluated by generating a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: A total of 663 pathological slices from 95 patients with ccRCC were collected. The mean number of slices per patient was 7.6 ± 2.7 (range: 3-17), with 506 tumor slices and 157 normal tissue slices. There were 200 tumor slices and 74 normal slices in the training set, and a total of 200,870 small images were extracted. There were 250 tumor slices and 63 normal slices in the test set, and a total of 39,211 small images were extracted. According to the CNN model and random forest model trained with the training set, 11 pathological slices in the test set were identified as false normal slices, and six pathological slices were identified as false tumor slices. The total accuracy was 94.6% (296/313), the precision rate was 97.6% (239/245), and the recall rate was 95.6% (239/250). The generated probabilistic heatmaps were consistent with the manually annotated pathological images. The ROC curve results revealed that the area under curve (AUC) reached 0.9658 (95% confidence interval: 0.9603-0.9713), the specificity was 90.5%, and the sensitivity was 95.6%. Conclusion: The use of a deep learning method for the diagnosis of ccRCC is feasible. The ccRCC model established in this study achieved high accuracy. AI-based diagnostic methods for ccRCC may improve diagnostic efficiency.

Indexed as

clear cell renal cell carcinomaconvolutional neural networkdeep learningwhole-slide images

Identifiers

PMID40321674
PMCPMC12049625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.