Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40321657›Full record

ReviewLancet regional health. Americas2025

Intersectionality and interseccionalidad-the best of both worlds.

Jamie White, Amanda Cordova-Gomez, Raul Mejía, Janine A Clayton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jamie WhiteOffice of Research on Women's Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Amanda Cordova-GomezOffice of Population and Reproductive Health, USAID/Public Health Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Raul MejíaCentro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad (CEDES), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Janine A ClaytonOffice of Research on Women's Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this personal view paper, we contrast an early form of intersectionality within Latin American social medicine in the early 20th century to a form of identity-based intersectionality advanced in the USA in the latter half of the same century. The proponents of social medicine grasped and applied the principles of intersectionality from the 1930s onward, focusing on the influence of intersectional contextual factors on health. We distinguish this form of intersectionality as "

Indexed as

InterseccionalidadIntersectionalityLatin AmericaNorth AmericaPublic healthSocial determinants of healthSocial medicine

Identifiers

PMID40321657
PMCPMC12049687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.