Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40321651›Full record

ReviewLancet regional health. Americas2025

Intersectionality and diversity, equity, and inclusion in the healthcare and scientific workforces.

Trenell J Mosley, Rachel A Zajdel, Ethel Alderete, Janine A Clayton, Shirin Heidari, Eliseo J Pérez-Stable, Karen Salt, Marie A Bernard

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Trenell J MosleyOffice of the Chief Officer for Scientific Workforce Diversity, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA.
Rachel A ZajdelNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Ethel AldereteICTER, UNJU, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina.
Janine A ClaytonOffice of Research on Women's Health, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Shirin HeidariGendro, Geneva, Switzerland.
Eliseo J Pérez-StableNational Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Karen SaltManchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, England, UK.
Marie A BernardOffice of the Chief Officer for Scientific Workforce Diversity, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enhancing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in the scientific and healthcare workforces∗ promotes research innovation and equitable access to quality healthcare. Efforts to advance DEI within the global scientific and healthcare workforces have assumed a new urgency given the strain caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the aging of the global population, and the persistent shortages in the healthcare workforce, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Yet, these fields continue to struggle to promote DEI. Considering the impact of intersectionality-how multiple identities interact to create unique experiences of privilege and power-within these workforces will enhance efforts to promote DEI. This series explores the impact of intersectionality on scientific and healthcare workforce DEI and how prominent institutional and structural factors (e.g., sexism and racism), as well as their interpersonal manifestations, can create barriers for workers with multiple intersecting marginalised identities. This paper, the first in a three-part series, describes how intersecting identities interact with workplace inequities and suggests ways to incorporate intersectionality into DEI efforts within the scientific and healthcare workforces. ∗We use the phrase

Indexed as

Diversity, equity, and inclusionHealthcare workforceIntersectionalityScientific workforceWorkforce diversity

Identifiers

PMID40321651
PMCPMC12049688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.