ArticlePerspectives on medical education2025
Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- 'See me for me': An intersectional approach exploring sexual and gender minority medical students' experiences of role models.Medical education · 2026Article
- Showing Up is Still Resistance: Contextualizing Black Trainee Resistance in Medical Education.Perspectives on medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In medical education, acts of professional resistance have been studied across all racial and ethnic groups as an antidote to the social harm and injustice festering in medical education. However, not everyone experiences medical education in the same way; some groups experience it quite differently because of their social positions. In particular, Black physicians face anti-Black racism in medical education, which has the potential to shape their resistance in a particular way. This study was designed to understand what professional resistance looks like in Black residents/fellows in North America and how being Black shaped their experiences of resistance. Methods: This qualitative study used Endarkened storywork to understand how Black GME physicians experienced acts of resistance. Endarkened storywork is a Black-centered approach to research and a way of reclaiming authority to create knowledge. It weaves Endarkened feminism, Afrofuturism, and Indigenous storywork to center storytelling as essential to Black ways of being. We conducted 14 semi-structured interviews and analyzed the data using thematic, theoretical, and emergent coding through the constructs of Re-storying, Endarkened Storywork, and Black quilting. Results: Black trainees' stories of resistance produced three quilting blocks to illuminate their experiences. First, resistance means continuing to exist in medicine despite all of the profession's efforts to eradicate Black physicians. Second, they work tirelessly to improve Black health and facilitate opportunities for the future of Black people to have a career in medicine. Third, their resistance must contend with a long history of anti-Black racism, which takes a significant toll on the emotional and mental well-being of Black trainees in ways that are best described as racial battle fatigue. Discussion: For Black trainees, professional resistance is nuanced and calls into the present a long history of anti-Black racism. Their resistance includes occupying space in medicine, securing a future where Black people exist as physicians, and resisting the emotional burden of doing this work. While all forms of professional resistance are worthy of study, researchers should pay particular attention to how it manifests in various racial groups to understand the nuances of different strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.