ArticleACS omega2025
Python-Based Algorithm for Calculating Physical Properties of Aqueous Mixtures Composed of Substances Not Available in Databases.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recovery Yield and Defective Product Rate in a Bio-Based Amino Acid Crystallization Process.ACS omega · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we developed a Python-based open-source algorithm compatible with the aqueous physical property models provided in the electrolyte templates of AspenTech software. To validate the accuracy of the model, the results obtained from the proposed algorithm were compared to experimental data for 37 binary aqueous mixture systems covering properties such as density, heat capacity, viscosity, and thermal conductivity. The input variables included results from our previous research on pure component property prediction and the nonrandom two-liquid (NRTL) model parameters based on the UNIFAC model simulations. This open-source algorithm is compatible with AspenTech software. The mean absolute percentage errors (MAPE) for density, heat capacity, viscosity, and thermal conductivity were 2.88, 0.355, 12.1, and 10.1%, respectively. In the case of density and viscosity, the actual data trends could not be accurately reflected under high-concentration conditions for certain substances. In addition, it was confirmed that inaccurate predictions of the viscosity and thermal conductivity in the commercial-scale falling-film evaporator simulation for l-valine production led to inaccurate predictions of the overall heat transfer coefficient. Therefore, caution is required when predicting missing property parameters using this approach as significant errors may occur. Nevertheless, this algorithm can provide an initial parameter value for property models that are not included in existing databases without any commercial package.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.