Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40321543›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

PEI-Reinforced GO/g-C

Wenbiao Zheng, Mingfeng Yu, Sujuan Yang, Licong Meng, Yonghe Xiu, Yifan Liu, Hanhui Lei, Terence Xiaoteng Liu, Zhanhui Yuan, Liwei Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Wenbiao ZhengCollege of Environmental and Safety Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China.
Mingfeng YuCollege of Materials and Chemical Engineering, Minjiang University, Fuzhou 350108, China.
Sujuan YangCollege of Materials and Chemical Engineering, Minjiang University, Fuzhou 350108, China.
Licong MengCollege of Materials and Chemical Engineering, Minjiang University, Fuzhou 350108, China.
Yonghe XiuCollege of Materials and Chemical Engineering, Minjiang University, Fuzhou 350108, China.
Yifan LiuCollege of Environmental and Safety Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China.
Hanhui LeiDepartment of Mechanical and Construction Engineering, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 8ST, U.K.
Terence Xiaoteng LiuDepartment of Mechanical and Construction Engineering, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 8ST, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7574-1709
Zhanhui YuanCollege of Materials Engineering, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2670-990X
Liwei WangCollege of Materials and Chemical Engineering, Minjiang University, Fuzhou 350108, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0741-157X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Membrane separation is an important separation and purification technology, membrane materials are the key to membrane separation technology, and the rapid development of two-dimensional materials in recent years has brought new opportunities for membrane separation technology. Graphene oxide (GO) is a hydrophilic two-dimensional material, and its unique physical and chemical structure and properties give it the potential to become a high-performance separation membrane; however, the instability limits its application. In this study, a two-dimensional material, graphite-phase carbon nitride (g-C

Identifiers

PMID40321543
PMCPMC12044557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.