ArticleACS omega2025
Modulating Cancer Stem Cell Characteristics in CD133+ Melanoma Cells through Hif1α, KLF4, and SHH Silencing.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- SHH pathway inhibition and astrocyte co-culture induce distinct responses in glioblastoma and cancer stem cells.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integrated spectroscopic and morphological analyses reveal cellular shifts in gene-silenced melanoma CSCs.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Time-Dependent Effects of Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound on Apoptosis and Autophagy in Malignant Melanoma Stem Cells.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malignant melanoma is a highly aggressive form of skin cancer, partly driven by a subset of cancer stem cells (CSCs) with remarkable capacities for self-renewal, differentiation, and resistance to therapy. In this study, we examined how silencing three key genes-Hif1α, KLF4, and SHH-affects CSC characteristics. Using small interfering RNA (siRNA)-based approaches, we observed significant changes at both the gene and protein levels, shedding light on how these pathways influence melanoma progression. Our results demonstrated that silencing these genes reduces the stem-like features of CSCs. Notably, Hif1α silencing triggered a marked decrease in hypoxia-related gene expression, while targeting SHH led to a reduction in Gli1, a downstream effector of SHH signaling, highlighting its potential as a therapeutic target. We also observed changes in epigenetic markers such as HDAC9 and EP300, which play crucial roles in maintaining stemness and regulating gene expression. Interestingly, these interventions appeared to reprogram CSCs, pushing them toward a phenotype distinct from both traditional CSCs and non-stem cancer cells (NCSCs). Our findings emphasize the importance of targeting key signaling pathways in melanoma CSCs and underscore the value of mimicking the tumor microenvironment in experimental models. By revealing the dynamic plasticity of melanoma CSCs, this study offers fresh insights into potential therapeutic strategies, particularly using siRNA to modulate pathways associated with tumor progression and stem cell behavior.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.