ArticlePCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences2025
A comparative study of social distance toward epilepsy and mental health conditions in Japan.
Article in PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A comparative study of social distance toward epilepsy and mental health conditions in Japan.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to identify factors influencing perceived social distance from epilepsy, depression, panic disorder, and schizophrenia in Japan, with a focus on informing targeted stigma-reduction strategies. Methods: We conducted face-to-face interviews with 103 participants, gathering data on sociodemographic factors, attitudes using the Japanese version of the Scales of Attitudes toward People with Epilepsy (SAPE-J), and perceived social distance via visual analog scales (VASs). To identify significant predictors for each condition, we applied multiple linear regression analyses and rigorously validated the models through diagnostic checks. Results: Our analysis revealed that epilepsy was perceived as the most distant condition ( Conclusion: We demonstrate that perceptions of social distance are condition-specific and shaped by unique factors, such as beliefs, education, and personal experiences. We advocate for tailored stigma-reduction approaches, emphasizing the treatability of epilepsy and addressing misconceptions about unpredictability in mental health conditions. Our findings provide a foundation for fostering social inclusion and advancing public understanding of these conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.