ArticlePCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences2025
Development and cross-cultural validation of the Japanese version of the Adjustment Disorder-New Module-20.
Article in PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and cross-cultural validation of the Japanese version of the Adjustment Disorder-New Module-20.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Adjustment disorder (AjD) is a prevalent mental disorder with evolving definitions in the Methods: A forward-backward translation approach was used to develop the Japanese version of the ADNM-20. Psychometric properties were assessed through a web-based survey of 1314 participants, examining factorial validity, construct validity, and internal consistency. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis supported the theoretical six-factor model (comparative fit index = 0.923, root-mean-square error of approximation = 0.079), with strong correlations between the ADNM-20 subscales and external measures (e.g., depression PHQ-9, Conclusion: The Japanese ADNM-20 is a valid and reliable scale for assessing AjD symptoms in the Japanese general population. Further studies involving clinical populations are warranted to confirm its applicability in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.