ArticleEuropean urology open science2025
ProstaPilot: A Comparative Study of Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Prostate-specific Antigen as a Screening Test for Prostate Cancer.
Article in European urology open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring motivations and barriers in prostate cancer screening: lessons from a volunteer-based MRI screening study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Our aim was to compare detection rates for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC) between biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening pathways in the Czech population, which has a high prevalence of opportunistic PSA testing (45% in the target age group). Methods: Between May 2022 and May 2023, 423 men aged 50-69 yr who were enrolled via volunteer-based recruitment, underwent both PSA testing and bpMRI of the prostate. Positive results were defined as PSA ≥3 μg/l or a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System score of 4-5. Those with positive tests were referred for further evaluation, including an MRI-targeted biopsy and a systematic 12-core biopsy. csPC was defined as any cancer of International Society of Urological Pathology grade group ≥2. Key findings and limitations: Of the 423 men, 35 (8.3%) had at least one positive screening test. The PSA-based pathway identified 25 men (5.9%), whereas the MRI-based pathway identified 16 (3.8%) with suspicion of PC, with potential to reduce the number of biopsies required by 36%. Subsequent biopsy revealed PC in seven men (1.7%) with a positive PSA test and 14 men (3.3%) with positive MRI findings. Nonsignificant PC and csPC rates were 1.0% ( Conclusions and clinical implications: In a highly prescreened population, bpMRI may increase the csPC detection rate while reducing the number of biopsies needed in comparison to PSA-based diagnosis. However, bpMRI may also slightly increase the detection of grade group 1 cancers. Patient summary: We compared a blood test for PSA (prostate-specific antigen) and an MRI scan (magnetic resonance imaging) for detection of prostate cancer in men aged 50-69 years. We found that MRI scans may reduce the number of biopsies that need to be performed for cancer diagnosis while increasing the detection rate for cancers that are significant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.