ArticleOTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma2025
Trauma systems: a global comparison.
Article in OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Guidelines for Essential Trauma Care: Second Edition (2026).World journal of surgery · 2026Guideline
- Global challenges and perspectives in acute and emergency general surgery in low and middle-income countries: a scoping review.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Epidemiology of Craniomaxillofacial Trauma in Chile: A Systematic Review and 24-Year Nationwide Interrupted Time-Series Analysis.Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction · 2026Review
- Review
- Article
- Time-dependent microbial colonisation of temporary external fixations: a prospective descriptive study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Biological sex, but not obesity, independently predicts anatomical injury patterns in trauma bay patients: a multivariate retrospective analysis of 2,128 patients.Biology of sex differences · 2026Article
- [Construction of an Early-stage Risk Prediction Model for Trauma-Induced Coagulopathy].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2026Article
- Regional, multimodal, and opioid-sparing strategies after trauma: a review.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2026Review
- Epidemiology, Clinical Outcomes, and Emergency Department Utilization Among Trauma Patients in Northern Iran: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.Bulletin of emergency and trauma · 2026Article
- The Impact of Indirect Transport to a Trauma Centre on Survival for Major Trauma Patients: A National Propensity-Adjusted Observational Study.International journal of population data science · 2026Observational
- Nutritional Adequacy and Day-to-Day Energy Variability: Impacts on Outcomes in Severe Trauma Patients.Nutrients · 2025Observational
- Early medical care and trauma management in mass casualties from major explosive accidents: a retrospective analysis and recommendations.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traumatic injuries are a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, with 40 million people permanently injured and nearly 6 million deaths every year. Approximately 90% of trauma-related deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries, and 50% of trauma-related deaths are believed to be preventable. Although effective trauma systems encompassing prehospital, hospital, and rehabilitative care are critical for improving outcomes, global documentation remains limited. This study provides a comparative analysis of trauma care systems across 8 countries-the United States, Canada, Brazil, Belgium, the Netherlands, Australia, Japan, and South Africa-spanning 5 continents. Each country's analysis includes demographic context, system organization (including prehospital, hospital, and posthospital care), clinical and systemic outcomes, and future directions. Trauma systems across countries vary significantly in the structure and regulation of trauma care, injury patterns, national data collection, and accessibility, reflecting diverse demographics and healthcare infrastructures. National trauma registries are well established in countries like the Netherlands, Japan, and Canada but are in early development stages in Brazil, South Africa, and Belgium. In some countries, such as the Netherlands and Canada, trauma from traffic collisions and falls dominates, whereas others, such as Brazil and South Africa, have higher rates of violence-related injuries like homicides. Accessibility in remote areas remains a challenge in countries with large landmasses such as Canada and Australia, where rural populations often face limited or delayed trauma care. Other countries, such as the United States and South Africa, face different challenges linked to disparities in quality of and access to care between public and private systems. Although centralization of trauma care, standardization of national trauma care systems, and investment in workforce and infrastructure are universal goals for improving outcomes, solutions tailored to each country are required to optimize trauma systems globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.