Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40321461›Full record

ArticleOTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma2025

Proximal humerus fractures: Treatment controversies.

Utku Kandemir, Guy Putzeys, Michael McKee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The masquelet technique for severe open fractures: current insights.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Long-term functional outcomes of Aequalis fracture hemiarthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture: a retrospective case series.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Utku KandemirDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7700-2464
Guy PutzeysOrthopaedic and Trauma Dept, AZ Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium.
Michael McKeeDept of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of proximal humerus fractures is challenging, and significant controversy exists even regarding which patients are indicated for surgical treatment. When surgery is indicated, open reduction and internal fixation is the most common type of treatment. Arthroplasty is reserved for unreconstructible fractures. Hemiarthroplasty may not provide good, reliable function but may be the best option in younger or middle-aged patients when fracture fixation is not feasible. While several studies reported no benefit of surgical treatment in elderly patients, more recent literature showed better outcomes with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Indexed as

arthroplastyfixationhemiarthroplastyproximal humerus fracturesreverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID40321461
PMCPMC12045299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.