ReviewGlobal health & medicine2025
Resilience building in public health rapid response teams in urban multi-hazard scenarios: Pathways and strategies from Shanghai, China.
Review in Global health & medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychosocial Preparedness for Disasters: A Scoping Review of International Models and Public Health Priorities.Current psychiatry reports · 2026Article
- Development and Evaluation of a Nurse Competency Assessment System for Public Health Emergencies.Nursing research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urban centers face a complex and multifaceted array of public health threats from infectious disease outbreaks and incidents of foodborne pathogens to health crises due to disasters, posing grave risks to people's health and societal stability. As the operational backbone of emergency response systems, public health rapid response teams are mission-critical in performing disease surveillance, outbreak containment, and clinical case management across all phases of emergencies. Nevertheless, persistent structural barriers including workforce deficits and competency mismatches constrain operational effectiveness during large-scale health emergencies. To address these challenges, this study proposes a resilience-building framework for public health rapid response teams that takes into account multi-hazard scenario planning and the evolving nature of events. Key interventions including institutional capacity building, strategic foresight initiatives, cross-sector policy integration, and tiered resource allocation systems have been implemented in order to enhance the core resilience dimensions of withstanding shocks, agile adaptability, and restoration of functioning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.