ReviewGlobal health & medicine2025
The world preparing for future pandemics and public health emergencies of international concern: Comparison of various multilateral access and benefit-sharing mechanisms and the impact of a new WHO mechanism for pathogens with pandemic potential on Japanese access and benefit-sharing policy.
Review in Global health & medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently, there is a member-state-led discussion in the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body of the World Health Organization (WHO) to draft and negotiate a convention, agreement, or other international instrument under the Constitution of the WHO to strengthen global pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response (WHO CA+). An access and benefit-sharing (ABS) mechanism for pathogens is likely to be a key element of this instrument, as it may provide legal certainty for rapid pathogen sharing and global access to medical countermeasures against future pandemics and in some cases public health emergencies of international concern, which are expected to be provided to countries in need. A multilateral ABS mechanism may resolve issues arising from the bilateral nature of the current ABS mechanism established under the Nagoya Protocol (which requires recipients to decipher the complex web of ABS legislation, thereby preventing rapid access to pathogens), and may also improve uneven global access to medical countermeasures during pandemics. This study analyzes the ongoing WHO discussion on ABS mechanisms while reviewing other examples of such mechanisms, including those outside the health sector. Additionally, there is a growing global interest in mapping national policies on ABS, as discussions on international policies are ongoing in multiple fora. This study furthermore introduces Japan's ABS policy, which is not widely known, and explores how the new WHO mechanism could affect Japan, namely highlighting the importance and the challenges of participating in such a system for industry and academia in the context of a developed country.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.