Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40321427›Full record

ArticleClinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH2025

Development and Preliminary Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess Perceptions on the Implementation of UN CRPD Principles Concerning Social Inclusion and Participation of Persons with Disabilities in Municipalities.

Samantha Pinna, Massimo Tusconi, Michela Atzeni, Alessandra Perra, Valerio Leonetti, Giulia Cossu, Diego Primavera, Noemi Maria Mereu, Donatella Rita Petretto, Antonio Preti and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Samantha PinnaDepartment of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5152-3834
Massimo TusconiUniversity Hospital of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9155-4740
Michela AtzeniDepartment of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0645-3006
Alessandra PerraDepartment of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5791-1655
Valerio LeonettiUniversity Hospital of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy.
Giulia CossuDepartment of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1245-016X
Diego PrimaveraDepartment of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6335-003X
Noemi Maria MereuDepartment of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy.
Donatella Rita PetrettoDepartment of Pedagogy, Philosophy and Psychology, University of Cagliari, 09127 Cagliari, Italy.
Antonio PretiDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Elisa PelosinDepartment of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, IRCSS Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
Mehmet EskinDepartment of Psychology, College of Social Sciences and Humanities, Koç University, Rumelifeneri Yolu, 34450 Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkey.
Gian Mario MigliaccioDepartment of Human Sciences and Promotion of the Quality of Life, San Raffaele Rome Open University, 00166 Rome, Italy.
Mauro Giovanni CartaDepartment of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0706-9687
Federica SancassianiDepartment of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7963-5281

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The present study aims to evaluate the preliminary content and face validity of the Methods: A two-step Delphi methodology was used to build the questionnaire and assess its content and face validity. A group including health professionals, academics, experts in psychometrics, persons with disabilities and local policymakers was involved in building the questionnaire according to the CRPD articles regarding social inclusion and active participation of persons with disabilities. Two pools of experts assessed the content and face validity and lay stakeholders, respectively. Results: An average content validity index of 0.95 was obtained, with no items removed. Regarding face validity, all items achieved high scores, ranging from 17 to 21, with a face validity index of 0.95. Conclusion: The PICI-Q is a promising tool for assessing perceptions of CRPD implementation in municipalities. Its robust preliminary validation suggests it could support local authorities in designing and improving policies and interventions aligned with the CRPD principles of social inclusion and participation for persons with disabilities.

Indexed as

CRPDDisabilityHuman rightsParticipationQuestionnaireSocial inclusionToolValidation

Identifiers

PMID40321427
PMCPMC12046240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.