Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40321405›Full record

ArticlePsychology research and behavior management2025

Network Structure and Core Features of Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies in Chinese Adolescents with NSSI.

Peiyu Zhang, Jingyu Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology research and behavior management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Peiyu ZhangClinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Shanghai Pudong New Area Mental Health Center, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Jingyu ShiClinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Shanghai Pudong New Area Mental Health Center, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Little research has focused on identifying the dynamic relationship and core features of cognitive emotion regulation strategies (CERS) that critically contribute to the onset and maintenance of NSSI. This study aims to investigate the CERS network structure in Chinese adolescents with NSSI through network analysis, identifying the core strategies within this network. Patients and Methods: A total of 2711 Chinese adolescents (50.5% female, mean age = 12.89 ± 0.73 years) were assessed using the CERQ. Independent Results: A total of 1065 adolescents (39.28%) reported engaging in NSSI at least once within the past six months. Among adolescents with NSSI, catastrophizing (strength = 1.32, betweenness = 1.98, closeness = 0.45) and rumination (strength = 1.18, betweenness = 1.10, closeness = 2.02) emerged as the most central CERS. In contrast, among adolescents without NSSI, catastrophizing (strength = 1.79, betweenness = 1.00, closeness = 0.08), rumination (strength = 0.34, betweenness = 1.00, closeness = 1.02), and positive reappraisal (strength = 0.57, betweenness = 1.50, closeness = 1.50) were identified as central CERS. Significant differences in network structure, global strength, and centrality were observed between the two groups, reflecting distinct patterns of CERS. Conclusion: NSSI is associated with tightly connected, rigid CERS networks. Targeted interventions should focus on reducing catastrophizing and enhancing positive reappraisal to disrupt these rigid cognitive emotion regulation patterns, ultimately mitigating the risk of NSSI.

Indexed as

Chinese adolescentscognitive emotion regulation strategies (CERS)network analysisnon-suicidal self-injury (NSSI)

Identifiers

PMID40321405
PMCPMC12049111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.