Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40321370›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2025

'Nasolabial Flap': A Versatile Solution for Oromandibular Defect Reconstructions in Patients with Lip and Oral Cavity Malignancies.

Dillip Kumar Samal, Vinusree Karakkandy, Pradipta K Parida, Pradeep Pradhan, Saurav Sarkar, Safia Saleem, Swagata Chakraborty, Abhijit Mishra, Yash Mittal, Aswathi Kallyadan Veetil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dillip Kumar SamalDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, AIIMS, Academic Block, Room No. 413, Bhubaneswar, 751019 India.ORCID 0000-0001-6264-4643
Vinusree KarakkandyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, AIIMS, Academic Block, Room No. 413, Bhubaneswar, 751019 India.
Pradipta K ParidaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, AIIMS, Academic Block, Room No. 413, Bhubaneswar, 751019 India.
Pradeep PradhanDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, AIIMS, Academic Block, Room No. 413, Bhubaneswar, 751019 India.
Saurav SarkarDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, AIIMS, Academic Block, Room No. 413, Bhubaneswar, 751019 India.
Safia SaleemDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, AIIMS, Academic Block, Room No. 413, Bhubaneswar, 751019 India.
Swagata ChakrabortyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, AIIMS, Academic Block, Room No. 413, Bhubaneswar, 751019 India.
Abhijit MishraDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, AIIMS, Academic Block, Room No. 413, Bhubaneswar, 751019 India.
Yash MittalDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, AIIMS, Academic Block, Room No. 413, Bhubaneswar, 751019 India.
Aswathi Kallyadan VeetilDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, AIIMS, Academic Block, Room No. 413, Bhubaneswar, 751019 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oro-mandibular defect reconstruction is always a challenge following the excision of oral cavity malignancies. Free flaps are considered ideal for the reconstruction of postexcision defects. Alternatively, regional flaps, like Nasolabial flaps, can be used as a workhorse for the reconstruction of various oral cavity defects with acceptable cosmesis. We have described here the various innovations and modifications of this flap that can be used for the repair of different subsites of the oral cavity. Fifty-eight nasolabial flap reconstructions in fifty-seven patients with malignancy of lips and oral cavity patients were included and evaluated retrospectively. They underwent wide local excision of the tumour with or without mandibular resection and cervical lymph node dissection, as per their extent of involvement. In all these patients, the oromandibular and lip defects were closed using nasolabial flaps as single or twostage procedures. Flap survival, outcomes and complications, if any, were evaluated based on their respective reconstruction subsites. Buccal mucosa, gingivobuccal sulcus, lip, tongue, retromolar trigone, upper alveolus and hard palate are the various subsites repaired with nasolabial flaps. Two patients had partial flap loss, and one had complete flap necrosis. None of the patients had significant donor site issues, except four patients who had ectropion, for which ophthalmologist intervention was sought. Most of the oral cavity defects can be reconstructed with various modifications of the nasolabial flaps. Considering favourable aestehtic and functional outcome, it may be used as an alternative to free flap reconstruction in selected cases of small to medium defects with minimal donor site morbidity.

Indexed as

MandibulectomyNasolabial flapNeck dissectionOromandibular defectSquamous cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID40321370
PMCPMC12043538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.