ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2025
'Nasolabial Flap': A Versatile Solution for Oromandibular Defect Reconstructions in Patients with Lip and Oral Cavity Malignancies.
Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent innovations in nasolabial and facial artery myomucosal flaps: A commentary.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oro-mandibular defect reconstruction is always a challenge following the excision of oral cavity malignancies. Free flaps are considered ideal for the reconstruction of postexcision defects. Alternatively, regional flaps, like Nasolabial flaps, can be used as a workhorse for the reconstruction of various oral cavity defects with acceptable cosmesis. We have described here the various innovations and modifications of this flap that can be used for the repair of different subsites of the oral cavity. Fifty-eight nasolabial flap reconstructions in fifty-seven patients with malignancy of lips and oral cavity patients were included and evaluated retrospectively. They underwent wide local excision of the tumour with or without mandibular resection and cervical lymph node dissection, as per their extent of involvement. In all these patients, the oromandibular and lip defects were closed using nasolabial flaps as single or twostage procedures. Flap survival, outcomes and complications, if any, were evaluated based on their respective reconstruction subsites. Buccal mucosa, gingivobuccal sulcus, lip, tongue, retromolar trigone, upper alveolus and hard palate are the various subsites repaired with nasolabial flaps. Two patients had partial flap loss, and one had complete flap necrosis. None of the patients had significant donor site issues, except four patients who had ectropion, for which ophthalmologist intervention was sought. Most of the oral cavity defects can be reconstructed with various modifications of the nasolabial flaps. Considering favourable aestehtic and functional outcome, it may be used as an alternative to free flap reconstruction in selected cases of small to medium defects with minimal donor site morbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.