Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40321366›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2025

Safety and effectiveness of fecal microbiota, live-jslm (REBYOTA

Sahil Khanna, David Yoho, Daniel Van Handel, Brian J Clark, Tahany Awad, Beth Guthmueller, Daniel Armandi, Whitfield Knapple, Nasia Safdar, Brian Baggott and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05831189 (A Multi-center, Single-arm Trial Exploring the Safety and Clinical Effectiveness of RBX2660 Administered by Colonoscopy to Adults With Recurrent Clostridioides Difficile Infection), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05831189 phase3completednot on this map

A Multi-center, Single-arm Trial Exploring the Safety and Clinical Effectiveness of RBX2660 Administered by Colonoscopy to Adults With Recurrent Clostridioides Difficile Infection

TypeinterventionalSponsorFerring PharmaceuticalsRan2023 to 2025Enrolled41ConditionsClostridium Difficile Infection RecurrenceArmsRBX2660
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Newer Therapeutics to Selectively KillInfectious disease reports · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Prevention of recurrentTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sahil KhannaMayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7619-8338
David YohoMid-Atlantic Permanente Medical Group, Springfield, VA, USA.
Daniel Van HandelMNGI Digestive Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Brian J ClarkFerring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Tahany AwadFerring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Beth GuthmuellerFerring Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Parsippany, NJ, USA.
Daniel ArmandiFerring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Whitfield KnappleArkansas Gastroenterology, North Little Rock, AR, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4081-3304
Nasia SafdarUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Brian BaggottCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Karen SimonOm Research, Camarillo, CA, USA.
Paul FeuerstadtPACT Gastroenterology Center, Yale School of Medicine, Hamden, CT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7643-9576

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Recurrent Objectives: CDI-SCOPE assessed the safety and clinical effectiveness of RBL when administered via colonoscopy to adults with rCDI. Design: Single-arm, exploratory phase IIIb trial conducted at 12 sites in the United States. Methods: Eligible adults with rCDI received one administration of RBL consisting of one 150-mL dose of RBL, delivered via colonoscopy to the right side of the colon. The primary endpoint assessed RBL-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) within 8 weeks of RBL administration or until confirmed treatment failure. Secondary endpoints included treatment success (absence of CDI recurrence for 8 weeks following RBL administration), physician experience administering RBL via colonoscopy, and physician perception of participant benefit. Results: Of 54 participants screened, 41 were enrolled and received RBL via colonoscopy; 39 participants completed the 8-week visit. Five TEAEs in four participants (9.8%) were assessed as related to RBL, all of which were gastrointestinal and mild in severity. Overall, 18 participants (43.9%) experienced 33 TEAEs within 8 weeks, most of which were of mild (25/33; 75.8%) or moderate (5/33; 15.2%) severity. No TEAEs led to intensive care unit admission or death. Overall, 39 participants (95.1%) experienced treatment success; 2 participants (4.9%) withdrew consent and had an indeterminate outcome. Among physicians, 90.2% of investigators indicated a "positive" or "very positive" experience administering RBL by colonoscopy. All physicians assessed participant benefit as "much" or "very much" improved. Conclusion: This single-arm study suggests RBL administered via colonoscopy is practical, safe, and effective for preventing CDI recurrence following antibiotic treatment in adults. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05831189.

Indexed as

CDIClostridioides difficilecolonoscopylive biotherapeuticRBLRBX2660rCDI

Identifiers

PMID40321366
PMCPMC12049624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.