Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40321361›Full record

ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2025

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward nutritional management among patients with gastrointestinal cancer: A cross-sectional study.

Xiaoxu Zhi, Jie Chen, Liu Yang, Sheng Li, Liuliu Zhang, Yun Zhao, Min Wang, Zhiyan Zhou, Funa Yang, Zhie Gu and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Oral nutritional supplement compliance among hospitalized cancer patients: a cross-sectional study based on the KAP model.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Xiaoxu ZhiThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University & Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China.
Jie ChenThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University & Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China.
Liu YangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University & Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China.
Sheng LiThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University & Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China.
Liuliu ZhangThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University & Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China.
Yun ZhaoThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University & Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China.
Min WangThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University & Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China.
Zhiyan ZhouThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University & Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China.
Funa YangNursing Department, Henan Cancer Hospital & the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhenzhou, China.
Zhie GuEducation and Training Department, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou, China.
Xiaoju ZhangDepartment of Nursing, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Huizi TianDepartment of Gastric Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Tianjin, China.
Qin XuSchool of Nursing, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Jun YaoSchool of Health Policy and Management, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding nutritional management among patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2023 to May 2024 across hospitals in Jiangsu, Henan, Shanghai, and Tianjin, China. Participants completed questionnaires that collected demographic data and assessed their KAP toward nutritional management. Results: A total of 1239 valid questionnaires were analyzed. Among the participants, 769 (62.1%) were male, and 452 (36.5%) had been diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer for less than six months. The proportion of participants demonstrating adequate knowledge, positive attitudes, and proactive practices were 1018 (82.1%), 328 (26.4%), and 403 (32.5%), respectively. Multivariate logistic regression identified several factors independently associated with proactive practices, including adequate knowledge, lack of insurance, a gastrointestinal tumor duration of 2-3 years or more, no doubts about nutritional management, absence of nutritional screening, and having others as primary caregivers. Structural equation modeling revealed direct effects of knowledge on both attitude ( Conclusions: While most gastrointestinal cancer patients demonstrated adequate knowledge regarding nutritional management, their attitudes were predominantly negative, and their practices were largely inactive. These findings highlight a critical need for targeted educational interventions to bridge knowledge gaps and encourage more active engagement with nutritional guidelines.

Indexed as

Attitudes and practicesChinaCross-sectional studyGastrointestinal cancerKnowledgeNutritional management

Identifiers

PMID40321361
PMCPMC12049811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.