ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2025
High-Fidelity 3D Reconstruction for Accurate Anatomical Measurements in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Creating Virtual Intraoperative CT Images From Endoscopic Video During Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Proof-of-Concept Study.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2026Article
- Vision-Guided Surgical Navigation Using Computer Vision for Dynamic Intraoperative Imaging Updates.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2026Article
- Accurate 3D reconstruction of eardrum perforations using Structure from Motion photogrammetry.International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology · 2025Article
- From endoscopy to surgery: a translational perspective on early esophageal cancer management.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Achieving an accurate representation of the surgical scene is essential, as it enables precise surgical navigation. Surgeons currently rely on preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans to represent the surgical scene and plan sinus procedures. However, as tissue is resected and manipulated, the anatomy represented in preoperative images becomes increasingly inaccurate and outdated. The endoscopic 3D reconstruction provides an alternative solution to this challenge, for it captures the current surgical scene. Nevertheless, achieving high reconstruction accuracy is crucial in endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), where tissue margins lie within submillimeter distances to critical anatomy such as the orbits, cranial nerves, carotid arteries, and dura mater. To fulfill the need for a highly accurate intraoperative method of surgical scene modeling in ESS, we propose a system to generate 3D reconstructions of the sinus to garner relevant qualitative and quantitative anatomic information that substantially diverges from preoperative CT images as the surgery progresses. To achieve this, the pipeline of Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) is expanded to include methods that simulate stereoscopic views using only a monocular endoscope to iteratively refine the depth of reconstructions. The presented workflow provides accurate depth maps, global scaling, and geometric information without camera pose-tracking tools or fiducial markers. Additional methods of point cloud denoising, outlier removal, and dropout patching have been developed and implemented to increase point cloud robustness. This expanded workflow demonstrates the ability to create high-resolution and accurate 3D reconstructions of the surgical scene. Using a series of three cadaveric specimens, measurements of critical anatomy were evaluated with average reconstruction errors for ethmoid length and height being 0.25mm and 0.52mm, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.