ReviewJournal of biomedical optics2025
Perspective on the use of fluorescence molecular imaging for peripheral and deep
Review in Journal of biomedical optics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Introduction to the Special Issue on Molecular Guided Surgery.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Significance: Current standard practice for margin assessment in solid tumor resection often leads to suboptimal results due to the inability to assess margins completely in a time-efficient manner. On the other hand, for small skin cancers, peripheral and deep Aim: We aim to explore fluorescence molecular imaging (FMI) as a tool for resolving obstacles and integrating PDEMA into the surgeon-to-pathologist workflow for large solid tumors. Approach: A review of recent pre-clinical and clinical studies using FMI to assess surgical margins was conducted to highlight promising fluorescence imaging technologies utilized in the surgical suite and laboratory. Results: FMI techniques that provide macroscopic resolution are efficient in time and have a notable ability to identify true negative tissue yet have limited capability in identifying true positive tissues. Moreover, meso- and microscopic FMI methods require additional time to attain a higher resolution but deliver an enhanced sensitivity in detecting true positive tissues. In both cases, experts are still required to learn to interpret the FMI signals, which prohibits a seamless clinical integration. Conclusions: Our proposed margin assessment platform (MAP) incorporates both macroscopic and, meso- or microscopic imaging with post-processing and machine learning for interpretation, to enable the application of PDEMA into solid tumor surgery. MAP leverages the advantages of each technique and thoroughly tackles the limitations of time and expertise to optimize the efficiency and accuracy of margin assessment and ultimately improve clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.