ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Clinical Validation and Machine Learning Optimization of MyCog: A Self-Administered Cognitive Screener for Primary Care Settings.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary care presents an ideal opportunity for early detection of cognitive impairment, yet primary care clinics face barriers to cognitive screening. MyCog, an EHR-integrated tablet app that is self-administered during the rooming process of a primary care visit, streamlines the screening process to reduce barriers and encourage broader screening.
methodsWe compared MyCog performance from 65 adults with diagnosed cognitive impairment to 80 cognitively normal adults, all aged 65+, recruited from clinical settings. We leveraged the consensus of five machine learning models (LASSO, Elastic Net, Random Forest, Bayesian Logistic Regression, and Gradient Boosting) to select consistently discriminative variables for the final detection algorithm. Performance was assessed at for two evidence-based thresholds (Youden's J and Top Left) with ROC AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy as the primary metrics.
resultsAll five models showed strong diagnostic performance, with ROC AUC values ranging from 0.839 to 0.876. The consensus modeling approach consistently identified the MyCog Picture Sequence Memory (PSM) exact match score and the MyCog Dimensional Change Card Sort (DCCS) overall rate-correct score as predictors of cognitive impairment. The final logistic regression achieved a robust AUC of 0.890. Depending on the cut point selected, sensitivity ranged from 0.723-0.785 (95% CI: 0.547-0.877), specificity 0.825-0.912 (95% CI: 0.716-0.954), accuracy 0.807-0.828 (95% CI: 0.731-0.869). DISCUSSION: MyCog provides practical, accurate cognitive screening for primary care. The sub-7-minute self-administered assessment eliminates staffing requirements and automates evaluation, addressing screening barriers to facilitate earlier detection and improve clinical outcomes. The algorithm's robust performance and parsimony demonstrate clinical utility while maintaining diagnostic accuracy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.