ArticleCurrent research in microbial sciences2025
Towards a comprehensive view of wetland benthic communities.
Article in Current research in microbial sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Benthic prokaryotic communities, utmost important for wetlands and marine environments functioning, are influenced by physical-chemical parameters and interactions with other communities, especially micro-eukaryotes and meiofauna. Thus, a holistic view of the benthic community is necessary to fully understand their organization and functioning. This study assesses the implementation of a comprehensive view, using mock communities and environmental samples. A DNA extraction strategy combining two procedures is proposed: one to obtain DNA from micro-organisms, using 0.25 g of sediment, and the other from meiofauna, using 0.25 g of sieving refluxes from 5 g of sediment. Three conditions were considered to create mock communities: (i) varying eukaryotes' abundance, (ii) adding meiofauna from salted or freshwater wetlands, and (iii) including or not a sediment matrix. Most organisms composing the mock communities were detected, except a filamentous cyanobacteria. All mock communities showed similar composition indicating that sediment did not affect the DNA extraction. This result also demonstrated that sieving, necessary to enrich meiofauna from sediment, does not significantly affect any of the communities. For the environmental samples investigated, most of the taxa usually described in the literature were retrieved in the salted, brackish and freshwater marshes sediment. The proposed approach was successful in analysing organisms from the three domains of life in a unique environmental sample, providing a holistic view of the benthic community. Furthermore, the significant differences observed between samples from the three different marshes, indicated that our approach can be used for conducting successful ecological studies, especially useful for understanding benthic communities' interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.