ArticleThe application of clinical genetics2025
NIPT of Maternal Plasma-Originated cfDNA: Applications and Guide for the Implementation.
Article in The application of clinical genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The implementation of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in maternal plasma, based on cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis, has progressed over the last two decades and is now integrated into the Spanish National Health System. However, there remains significant heterogeneity in its indications, technical methodologies, and reporting standards, reflecting international variability. This guide, developed by experts from the Spanish Association of Prenatal Diagnosis (AEDP) and the Spanish Association of Human Genetics (AEGH), provides recommendations to standardize NIPT application. It addresses key aspects such as technical and analytical requirements, integration with invasive diagnostic methods, pre- and post-test genetic counseling, and legal considerations. Additionally, the guide discusses the detection of common aneuploidies, the limitations in identifying structural chromosomal abnormalities and rare variants, and the impact of biological and clinical factors on test performance. By establishing a minimum framework based on scientific evidence, this document aims to optimize NIPT implementation in a cost-effective manner, ensuring clinical validity and informed decision-making for both healthcare professionals and pregnant women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.