Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40321196›Full record

ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2025

Multicenter evaluation of abbreviated MRI and ultrasound for detecting early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma.

Karim Seif El Dahan, Takeshi Yokoo, Darine Daher, Matthew S Davenport, David T Fetzer, Mishal Mendiratta-Lala, Nicole E Rich, Edward Yang, Neehar D Parikh, Amit G Singal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Comparison of abbreviated MRI and ultrasonography in the detection of early hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Karim Seif El DahanDepartment of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Takeshi YokooDepartment of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Darine DaherDepartment of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Matthew S DavenportDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
David T FetzerDepartment of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Mishal Mendiratta-LalaDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Nicole E RichDepartment of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Edward YangDivision of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Medical Group, Riverside, CA, USA.
Neehar D ParikhDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Amit G SingalDepartment of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & aims: Abbreviated MRI (AMRI) has been proposed as an alternative to ultrasound for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance; however, comparative data for AMRI and ultrasound are needed. Thus, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-AMRI and ultrasound for early-stage HCC detection in patients with cirrhosis. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective case-control study among patients with cirrhosis (cases with early-stage HCC as per Milan Criteria; controls without HCC) who underwent an ultrasound and a DCE-MRI within a 6-month period between 2012 and 2019. HCC diagnosis was confirmed by imaging alone in 85% and by histopathology in 15% of patients. Dynamic AMRI examinations were simulated from the full MRI by selecting relevant sequences. Independent, blinded interpretations of ultrasounds and AMRI results were performed using Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System algorithms. Ultrasounds were considered positive if US-3 observations were detected. AMRI was considered positive if LR-4, LR-5, or LR-M were detected. Per-patient sensitivity and specificity for early-stage HCC detection were estimated, and cross-modality differences were tested. Results: We included 216 cases and 432 controls. Patient-level sensitivity and specificity of AMRI were significantly higher compared with ultrasound: 80.1% (95% CI 76.1-83.6) Conclusions: Dynamic AMRI may be more sensitive and specific for early-stage HCC detection in patients with cirrhosis compared with ultrasound, although its relative benefit might be smaller in patients with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis. Larger direct comparative data sets are needed, particularly among patients with Child-Pugh C cirrhosis who may benefit from alternative surveillance strategies. Impact and implications: Abbreviated MRI (AMRI) is increasingly recognized as an alternative to ultrasound for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance. However, existing data are limited by single-center samples, spectrum bias, and lack of comparative data for AMRI

Indexed as

Abbreviated MRICirrhosisHepatocellular carcinomaSurveillanceUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID40321196
PMCPMC12048809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.