ArticleChemical science2025
TRAP: a contrastive learning-enhanced framework for robust TCR-pMHC binding prediction with improved generalizability.
Article in Chemical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence for translational personalized neoantigen cancer vaccine development.Journal of biomedical science · 2026Review
- AI-driven neoantigen identification: a comprehensive review from somatic variant calling to T cell recognition.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Modeling TCR-Epitope Recognition Specificity: What We Should Learn to Succeed.Immunological reviews · 2026Review
- Computational prediction of TCR cross-reactivity: principles, challenges and translational opportunities.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Highly biased DNA sequence reconstruction in DNA storage with multi-scale attention mechanism and contrast learning.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026Article
- Supervised fine-tuning enhances unsupervised learning from 45 million amino acids in TCR and peptide sequences.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- STAG-LLM: Predicting TCR-pHLA binding with protein language models and computationally generated 3D structures.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The binding of T cell receptors (TCRs) to peptide-MHC I (pMHC) complexes is critical for triggering adaptive immune responses to potential health threats. Developing highly accurate machine learning (ML) models to predict TCR-pMHC binding could significantly accelerate immunotherapy advancements. However, existing ML models for TCR-pMHC binding prediction often underperform with unseen epitopes, severely limiting their applicability. We introduce TRAP, which leverages contrastive learning to enhance model performance by aligning structural and sequence features of pMHC with TCR sequences. TRAP outperforms previous state-of-the-art models in both random and unseen epitope scenarios, achieving an AUPR of 0.84 (a 22% improvement over the second-best model) and an AUC of 0.92 in the random scenario, and an AUC of 0.75 (almost 11% higher than the second-best model) in the unseen epitope scenario. Furthermore, TRAP demonstrates a noteworthy capability to diagnose potential issues of cross-reactivity between TCRs and similar epitopes. This highly robust performance makes it a suitable tool for large-scale predictions in real-world settings. A specific case study confirmed that TRAP can discover hit TCRs with binding free energies comparable to referenced experimental results. These findings highlight TRAP's potential for practical applications and its role as a powerful tool in developing TCR-based immunotherapies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.