SynthesisEpilepsia2025
Predictors of atypical language lateralization in focal epilepsy: A mega-analysis of fMRI evidence.
Synthesis in Epilepsia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Predictors of atypical language lateralization in focal epilepsy: A mega-analysis of fMRI evidence.Epilepsia · 2025Pooled it
- Relationship between atypical language lateralization and cognition in pediatric patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy: role of working memory.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Subject-specific Functional ROIs Enhance Reliability in Language FMRI.Clinical neuroradiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo identify predictors of language lateralization derived from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in children and adults with left- and right-sided focal epilepsy.
methodsWe conducted a mega-analysis of data from 914 individuals from 24 samples. We used multilevel models to identify predictors of language lateralization in left and right hemisphere epilepsy groups. We assigned each participant a clinical predictor score to explore whether there was a cumulative influence of predictors on increasing atypical language lateralization.
resultsLeft hemisphere epilepsy was a predictor of greater atypical language lateralization in the combined sample. Additional predictors of atypical language lateralization included left/ambidextrous handedness in both the left and right hemisphere groups, and longer duration of epilepsy, frontal lobe involvement, and history of a stroke or other precipitating injury in the left hemisphere group only. There was a cumulative effect of predictors in the left hemisphere groups. Eighty percent of individuals with four or more predictors had atypical language lateralization, compared to 19% of individuals with no predictors, other than left hemisphere epilepsy. SIGNIFICANCE: Consistent with theories of language plasticity, we demonstrated a robust effect of early acquired left hemisphere injury on language lateralization. There was also a subtle effect of duration of epilepsy, perhaps reflecting increasing bilaterality with age in adulthood. The association between left/ambidextrous handedness and atypical language lateralization in the left and right hemisphere groups likely reflects both genetic and epilepsy-associated effects. The total number of predictors identified for an individual could serve as an indication for presurgical language fMRI, when surgical management is considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.