ArticleBrain and behavior2025
The Causal Relationship Between Neurotrophic Factors and Delirium: A Mendelian Randomization Study.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeveral observational studies have revealed that different neurotrophic factors (NTFs) are associated with delirium, yet the direction and magnitude of the causal association remain poorly understood. Herein, we performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to investigate the causal relationship between these factors and delirium.
methodsGWAS data for delirium were sourced from the FINN10 database; GWAS data for risk factors (protein kinase C-binding protein NELL1, neurotrophin-3, neurotrophin-4, brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels, nerve growth factor, ciliary neurotrophic factor, and glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor levels) were from the IEU Open GWAS. Inverse-variance weighted (IVW) was used as a primary analysis. MR-Egger, weighted median (WM), and weighted model were applied to validate the robustness of the results. The MR-Egger regression method was used to explore the presence of horizontal pleiotropy, and the MR pleiotropy residual sum, and outlier (MR-PRESSO) method was applied to detect potential outliers. Cochran's Q test assessed heterogeneity among instrumental variables (IVs). The leave-one-out (LOO) method was used to enhance the precision and veracity of our findings.
resultsIVW analyses revealed no association between risk factors and delirium. MR Egger, WM, and the weighted mode approach further confirmed these data. MR-Egger regression analysis confirmed the absence of directional pleiotropy in our analysis. Heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses showed reliable results.
conclusionNo association between other factors and delirium was identified; however, further research is needed to determine if these results apply to other races. Also, advances in molecular biology and epigenetics may shed light on this topic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.