ArticleDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2025
Detection of common bile duct dilatation on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography by deep learning.
Article in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploratory Machine Learning-Based Classification of Type 2 Diabetes Using Routine Clinical Parameters: A Single-Center Comparative Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to detect common bile duct (CBD) dilatation using deep learning methods from artificial intelligence algorithms.
methodsTo create a convolutional neural network (CNN) model, 77 magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) images without CBD dilatation and 70 MRCP images with CBD dilatation were used. The system was developed using coronal maximum intensity projection reformatted 3D-MRCP images. The ResNet50, DenseNet121, and visual geometry group models were selected for training, and detailed training was performed on each model.
resultsIn the study, the DenseNet121 model showed the best performance, with a 97% accuracy rate. The ResNet50 model ranked second, with a 96% accuracy rate.
conclusionCBD dilatation was detected with high performance using the DenseNet CNN model. Once validated in multicenter studies with larger datasets, this method may help in diagnosis and treatment decision-making. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Deep learning algorithms can aid clinicians and radiologists in the diagnostic process once technical, ethical, and financial limitations are addressed. Fast and accurate diagnosis is crucial for accelerating treatment, reducing complications, and shortening hospital stays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.