ArticleExperimental physiology2025
Mapping reticulospinal drive across various muscles of the upper and lower extremities.
Article in Experimental physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neurophysiological and neuromuscular responses associated with the repeated bout effect following eccentric exercise in healthy adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Review
- Impact of the brainstem in normal and impaired human movement control.The Journal of physiology · 2026Review
- Evidence for Increased High Alpha Intermuscular Coherence as a Measure of Reticulospinal Motor Drive.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Mapping reticulospinal drive across various muscles of the upper and lower extremities.Experimental physiology · 2025Article
- Reticulospinal modulation of muscle activation and electromechanical coupling: evidence from the StartReact paradigm.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Comparison of the reticulospinal drive to lumbar erector spinae muscles in postural and voluntary tasks using the StartReact paradigm.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The reticulospinal (RS) system is a fundamental descending pathway involved in human movement control. However, the relative strength of RS projections across different muscles and its specific contributions to distinct movements are poorly understood. We systematically mapped the RS drive across a broad range of muscles in the upper and lower extremities. The RS drive was assessed in 14 muscles of 29 healthy participants using the StartReact paradigm, characterized by shortened premotor reaction times when movement initiation is paired with a loud versus moderate acoustic stimulus. Reaction times were assessed by surface EMG. RS drive was compared as follows: (1) across individual muscles; (2) between proximal and distal muscles; and (3) between flexor and extensor muscles. The RS drive was lowest in the finger abductor, with significantly reduced values in comparison to those in the shoulder flexor and extensor, the elbow flexor, hip and knee extensors, and the ankle plantar flexor. A proximal-to-distal gradient in RS drive was observed only in the upper extremities, mainly attributable to the low RS drive to the finger abductor. Additionally, the RS drive was greater to flexors than to extensors in the upper extremities. Conversely, the RS drive was enhanced to extensors versus flexors in the lower extremities. Our findings emphasize the presence of RS drive in all examined muscles, with no distinctive proximal-to-distal gradient in RS motor control. Notably, a reversed flexor-extensor bias in RS control was evident between the upper and lower extremities. These findings advance our understanding of RS motor control and might inform the development of targeted neurorehabilitation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.