Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40321018›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2025

Effects of spinal transection and locomotor speed on muscle synergies of the cat hindlimb.

Alexander N Klishko, Jonathan Harnie, Claire E Hanson, S Mohammadali Rahmati, Ilya A Rybak, Alain Frigon, Boris I Prilutsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexander N KlishkoSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jonathan HarnieDepartment of Pharmacology-Physiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Claire E HansonSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
S Mohammadali RahmatiSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ilya A RybakDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Alain FrigonDepartment of Pharmacology-Physiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9259-2706
Boris I PrilutskySchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0499-3890

Funding

Limb coordination during locomotion before and after spinal cord injuryR01NS110550 · NINDS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BORIS I PRILUTSKY, Ilya A Rybak · 2020 to 2026
$3.9M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS110550
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been suggested that during locomotion, the nervous system controls movement by activating groups of muscles, or muscle synergies. Analysis of muscle synergies can reveal the organization of spinal locomotor networks and how it depends on the state of the nervous system, such as before and after spinal cord injury, and on different locomotor conditions, including a change in speed. The goal of this study was to investigate the effects of spinal transection and locomotor speed on hindlimb muscle synergies and their time-dependent activity patterns in adult cats. EMG activities of 15 hindlimb muscles were recorded in nine adult cats of either sex during tied-belt treadmill locomotion at speeds of 0.4, 0.7 and 1.0 m/s before and after recovery from a low thoracic spinal transection. We determined EMG burst groups using cluster analysis of EMG burst onset and offset times and muscle synergies using non-negative matrix factorization (NNMF). We found five major EMG burst groups and five muscle synergies in each of six experimental conditions (2 states × 3 speeds). In each case, the synergies accounted for at least 90% of muscle EMG variance. Both spinal transection and locomotion speed modified subgroups of EMG burst groups and the composition and activation patterns of selected synergies. However, these changes did not modify the general organization of muscle synergies. Based on the obtained results, we propose an organization for a pattern formation network of a two-level central pattern generator that can be tested in neuromechanical simulations of spinal circuits controlling cat locomotion. KEY POINTS: Analysis of muscle synergies during locomotion can reveal the organization of spinal locomotor networks. We recorded EMG activity of 15 hindlimb muscles in cats locomoting on a treadmill at speeds 0.4, 0.7 and 1.0 m/s before and after recovery from spinal cord transection at low thoracic level. We found five muscle synergies in all six experimental conditions (2 spinal states x 3 speeds) that include two flexor synergies operating in the swing phase and three extensor synergies operating in the stance phase. Major features of found synergies (the number, muscle composition and activation patterns) were not substantially affected by spinal transection and locomotion speed, suggesting that spinal control mechanism operates muscle synergies. Based on the obtained results, we proposed an organization of a pattern formation network of a two-level central pattern generator controlling locomotor activity of hindlimb muscles.

Indexed as

HindlimbLocomotionMuscle, SkeletalSpinal Cord InjuriesAnimalsCatsElectromyographyFemaleMalecentral pattern generatorlocomotionmuscle synergiesspinal transection

Identifiers

PMID40321018
PMCPMC12126613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.