Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40320920›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of surgical pathology2025

Confocal Laser Microscopy for Intraoperative Margin Assessment in Breast-Conserving Surgery: A New Procedure in the Pathology Laboratory Workflow.

Julien Colard-Thomas, Antonia Pialoux-Guibal, Pierre Gemival, Aurélie Maran-Gonzalez, Lakhdar Khellaf, Cristina Leaha, Evelyne Verdanet, Anne Mourregot, Marian Gutowski, Didier Pourquier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of surgical pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Current role of HistologPathologica · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Julien Colard-ThomasDepartment of Medical Oncology.
Antonia Pialoux-GuibalDepartment of Pathology.
Pierre GemivalDepartment of Pathology.
Aurélie Maran-GonzalezDepartment of Pathology.
Lakhdar KhellafDepartment of Pathology.
Cristina LeahaDepartment of Pathology.
Evelyne VerdanetDepartment of Pathology.
Anne MourregotDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Marian GutowskiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Didier PourquierDepartment of Pathology.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the breast-conserving surgery goals is to achieve negative resection margins and avoid reoperation. Therefore, accurate intraoperative margin assessment is essential, but still challenging. Recently, confocal microscopy devices, such as Histolog Scanner (HS), have shown promise for intraoperative margin assessment. The aim of this study was to assess HS for the intraoperative examination of lumpectomy specimens by the pathologists of our institute. Intraoperative margin assessment was performed by macroscopic assessment and by HS imaging to provide information for re-excision decision-making. The specific contribution of HS was evaluated by comparing the HS-based findings with the final pathology reports based on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue analysis. The study population included 20 women with histologically confirmed invasive breast carcinoma who underwent breast-conserving surgery (mean age of 62.9 y; 41 to 88 y; 21 tumors in total). HS led to the same decision as macroscopic examination in 76.2% of cases and prompted additional re-excisions in 19% of cases. Compared with the pathology reports, the accuracy rates of the macroscopic and HS assessments were 81% (58.1 to 94.6) and 95.2% (76.2 to 99.9), respectively. Moreover, 5 cases are described to illustrate HS practical contribution and limitations. In conclusion, HS is user-friendly, generally reliable, and enhances the routine macroscopic examination by providing detailed imaging of lumpectomy specimens. In combination with macroscopic examination, HS is an effective tool for intraoperative margin assessment, assisting both pathologists and surgeons in making accurate intraoperative decisions regarding margin re-excision, thereby preventing the need for new surgical operations.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastMargins of ExcisionMastectomy, SegmentalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMicroscopy, ConfocalMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsReoperationReproducibility of ResultsWorkflowbreast cancerconfocal microscopylumpectomymarginssurgery

Identifiers

PMID40320920
PMCPMC12352553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.