Trial reportInternational wound journal2025
A Prospective, Controlled, Randomised, Clinical Study of Negative Pressure Device Without Foam or Gauze for Skin and Soft Tissue Defects.
Trial report in International wound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reverse Aqua Pump Negative Pressure Wound Therapy: A Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial of Effectiveness and Affordability in Optimizing the Inflammatory and Proliferative Phases of Wound Healing in Developing Countries.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2026Article
- Inflammation and wound healing: a comprehensive overview of mechanisms, therapeutic strategies, and translational perspectives.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Clinical efficacy of mechanically activated tissue retractor combined with vacuum sealing drainage for treating deep soft tissue defects: a prospective study.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Contact Pressure Under Traditional Foam and Novel Thermoplastic Elastomer Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Interfaces.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
All common negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) systems include a filler material usually foam or gauze at the wound/device interface. The filler material distributes the negative pressure evenly to all parts of the wound. The foam or gauze may fragment contributing to foreign material being retained in the wound, becoming colonised with bacteria over time, and painful dressing changes. To mitigate these, negative aspects, an impermeable embossed single-layer NPWT membrane dressing has been developed. The dressing has been coined Negative Pressure-Platform Wound Device (NP-PWD) and a foam or gauze is not required to deliver negative pressure. Rather, the pressure is permeated via the spaces between the embossed pyramids and the wrinkles in the membrane. The purpose of this study was to compare the NP-PWD to the standard of care (SOC) NPWT system in the treatment of skin and soft tissue defects. This was a prospective, randomised, controlled clinical trial. The wounds were treated with the NP-PWD or SOC NPWT system. The randomised treatment was applied for 2 days to up to 9 days after the initial application. Follow-up data were collected at each dressing change/removal and included photographs, and assessments for wound healing, infection, and adverse events. In total 24 subjects (12 NP-PWD and 12 SOC) completed the study. The NP-PWD was easy to use and fast to apply and the patients tolerated it well. The transparency of the NP-PWD allowed the provider to see the wound without removing the dressing which is an improvement over traditional NPWT. In terms of wound healing, inflammation, pain, and infection, no differences were observed between the NP-PWD and the SOC NPWT system. The NP-PWD is a simplified, single component NPWT system eliminating the use of the filler material that commonly causes challenges during treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.