Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40320611›Full record

Trial reportInternational wound journal2025

A Prospective, Controlled, Randomised, Clinical Study of Negative Pressure Device Without Foam or Gauze for Skin and Soft Tissue Defects.

Kristo Nuutila, Victoria Diaz, Kristin Anselmo, Michael Broomhead, Elof Eriksson, Rodney K Chan

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International wound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Contact Pressure Under Traditional Foam and Novel Thermoplastic Elastomer Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Interfaces.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kristo NuutilaUnited States Army Institute of Surgical Research, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, Texas, USA.
Victoria DiazMetis Foundation, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Kristin AnselmoMetis Foundation, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Michael BroomheadApplied Tissue Technologies LLC, Hingham, Massachusetts, USA.
Elof ErikssonApplied Tissue Technologies LLC, Hingham, Massachusetts, USA.
Rodney K ChanMetis Foundation, San Antonio, Texas, USA.

Funding

Applied Tissue Technologies LLC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All common negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) systems include a filler material usually foam or gauze at the wound/device interface. The filler material distributes the negative pressure evenly to all parts of the wound. The foam or gauze may fragment contributing to foreign material being retained in the wound, becoming colonised with bacteria over time, and painful dressing changes. To mitigate these, negative aspects, an impermeable embossed single-layer NPWT membrane dressing has been developed. The dressing has been coined Negative Pressure-Platform Wound Device (NP-PWD) and a foam or gauze is not required to deliver negative pressure. Rather, the pressure is permeated via the spaces between the embossed pyramids and the wrinkles in the membrane. The purpose of this study was to compare the NP-PWD to the standard of care (SOC) NPWT system in the treatment of skin and soft tissue defects. This was a prospective, randomised, controlled clinical trial. The wounds were treated with the NP-PWD or SOC NPWT system. The randomised treatment was applied for 2 days to up to 9 days after the initial application. Follow-up data were collected at each dressing change/removal and included photographs, and assessments for wound healing, infection, and adverse events. In total 24 subjects (12 NP-PWD and 12 SOC) completed the study. The NP-PWD was easy to use and fast to apply and the patients tolerated it well. The transparency of the NP-PWD allowed the provider to see the wound without removing the dressing which is an improvement over traditional NPWT. In terms of wound healing, inflammation, pain, and infection, no differences were observed between the NP-PWD and the SOC NPWT system. The NP-PWD is a simplified, single component NPWT system eliminating the use of the filler material that commonly causes challenges during treatment.

Indexed as

BandagesNegative-Pressure Wound TherapySoft Tissue InjuriesWound HealingWounds and InjuriesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment Outcomeclinical trialnegative pressure platform wound device (NP‐PWD)negative pressure wound therapyNPWTwound healing

Identifiers

PMID40320611
PMCPMC12050212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.