Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40320496›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2025

Effect of chemotherapy on cancer specific mortality in female locally advanced urethral cancer.

Quynh Chi Le, Natali Rodriguez Peñaranda, Andrea Marmiroli, Francesco di Bello, Mattia Longoni, Fabian Falkenbach, Calogero Catanzaro, Michele Nicolazzini, Zhe Tian, Jordan A Goyal and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Quynh Chi LeCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada. d.le@med.uni-frankfurt.de.
Natali Rodriguez PeñarandaCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Andrea MarmiroliCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Francesco di BelloDepartment of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Mattia LongoniCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Fabian FalkenbachCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Calogero CatanzaroCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Michele NicolazziniCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Zhe TianCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Jordan A GoyalCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Carolin SiechDepartment of Urology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Cristina Cano GarciaDepartment of Urology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Fred SaadCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Riccardo SchiavinaDepartment of Urology, University of Bologna, St. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Salvatore MicaliDepartment of Urology, AOU di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Stefano PuliattiDepartment of Urology, AOU di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Ottavio De CobelliDepartment of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy.
Alberto BrigantiVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Markus GraefenMartini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Carlotta PalumboDivision of Urology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy.
Alessandro VolpeDivision of Urology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy.
Luis A KluthDepartment of Urology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Felix K-H ChunDepartment of Urology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Pierre I KarakiewiczCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo quantify the effect of chemotherapy (CHT) in locally advanced female primary urethral cancer (fPUC).

methodsIn the Surveillance, Epidemiology and Ends Results (SEER) database (2000-2021), we identified 295 fPUC patients with locally advanced stage treated with local therapy (surgery or radiation or both) with or without CHT. Multivariable Cox regression models addressed cancer specific mortality free survival (CSM). Sample power analyses were computed.

resultsOf 295 fPUC patients, 141 (48%) underwent CHT. CHT rates increased from 40 to 61% (Δ22%) over the study span (2000-2021). Five-year CSM rates of CHT exposed vs. CHT-naïve patients were 58 vs. 43% (Δ15%). In multivariable Cox regression models (age and histology adjusted) CHT independently predicted lower CSM (HR = 0.67, p = 0.027). In squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) subgroup, CHT also independently predicted lower CSM (HR = 0.64, p = 0.01). In urothelial carcinoma (HR = 0.63, p = 0.2) and adenocarcinoma (HR = 0.7, p = 0.7) independent predictor status could not be demonstrated. Small sample sizes in urothelial carcinoma subgroup (UC) and adenocarcinoma subgroup (ADK) undermined the power of the analyses to as low as 48% in UC and 46% in ADK, respectively, versus ideal 80% power.

conclusionIn fPUC patients, CHT independently predicts lower CSM. This effect is generalizable to SCC patients. The same relationship between CHT status and CSM is also operational in UC and ADK subgroups, but limited power undermined confirmation of its' statistical significance.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellUrethral NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesSEER ProgramSurvival RateCancer specific mortalityChemotherapyFemalesLocally advanced urethral cancer

Identifiers

PMID40320496
PMCPMC12050225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.