Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40320479›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2025

Six-year survival and clinical performance of glass hybrid restorations following selective caries removal in teeth with molar incisor hypomineralization: a prospective cohort study.

Berkant Sezer, Betül Şen Yavuz, Ceyda İpek İşseven, Nihan Tuğcu, Cansu Çalışkan, Başak Durmuş, Betül Kargül

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Restorative interventions and management of primary and permanent molars affected by molar incisor hypo-mineralization: a systematic review.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Berkant SezerDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, Türkiye. dt.berkantsezer@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9731-6156
Betül Şen YavuzDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Marmara University, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7561-8396
Ceyda İpek İşsevenDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Marmara University, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-4464-7525
Nihan TuğcuPrivate Practice, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Cansu ÇalışkanPrivate Practice, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Başak DurmuşDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Marmara University, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5870-0021
Betül KargülDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Marmara University, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3294-8846

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the clinical success and long-term survival of glass hybrid restorations in permanent first molars affected by molar incisor hypomineralization (MIH) following selective caries removal (SCR) over a six-year follow-up period. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis prospective cohort study included a total of 134 MIH-affected molars in 58 children (mean age 8.94 ± 1.41 years) restored with glass hybrid materials after SCR. Clinical outcomes were assessed at baseline and at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 72 months using modified USPHS criteria. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression with robust standard errors were conducted to evaluate restoration survival and identify potential predictors.

resultsThe overall estimated mean survival time of restorations was 59.82 ± 1.50 months. The survival probabilities for mild and severe lesions at six-year were 24.3% and 11.1%, respectively. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression with robust standard errors indicated that lesion severity, medium lesion extension, and large lesion extension had a statistically significant impact on restoration survival (p < 0.001 for all). While survival was satisfactory up to 2-3 years, a marked decline was observed over time, particularly in severely affected molars.

conclusionsGlass hybrid restorations demonstrated acceptable clinical performance in MIH-affected molars in the short to medium term but showed significant limitations in long-term survival. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The need for advancements in restorative materials tailored to the structural challenges of MIH. Glass hybrid materials remain a viable option for managing MIH-affected molars, particularly in young patients where minimally invasive approaches are prioritized.

Indexed as

Dental CariesDental Enamel HypoplasiaDental Restoration, PermanentChildDental Restoration FailureFemaleGlassGlass Ionomer CementsHumansMaleMolarMolar HypomineralizationProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeGlass Ionomer CementsDevelopmental dental anomaliesGlass hybrid restorationsMolar incisor hypomineralizationSelective caries removalSurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID40320479
PMCPMC12050231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.