ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhanced metal ion adsorption using ZnO-MXene nanocomposites with machine learning-based performance prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fabrication and performance evaluation of nZVI integrated PVDF nanocomposite membranes for the remediation of lead contaminated wastewater.Discover nano · 2026Article
- Enhanced hydrophilic properties and performance evaluation of PVDF-TiORSC advances · 2026Article
- MoSScientific reports · 2025Article
- Exploring the potential of MXenes in advanced energy, environmental, and biomedical applications.RSC advances · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The efficacy of ZnO-MXene nanocomposites as extremely effective adsorbents for the removal of metal ions from wastewater is investigated in this work. The two-step chemical method used to create composites showed how temperature affected their shape. In the adsorption studies, a high removal efficiency of 97% for chromium, 91% for cadmium, 97% for lead, and 96% for arsenic were observed. While isotherm studies showed a stronger fit with the Freundlich model, indicating heterogeneous adsorption, adsorption kinetics followed a pseudo-second-order model. The spontaneity and viability of adsorption, which is dominated by chemisorption mechanisms, were validated by thermodynamic studies. Furthermore, adsorption performance was well predicted by machine learning models such as Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM), with RF showing the highest accuracy. These results demonstrate that ZnO-MXene is a promising and reasonably priced nano adsorbent that can satisfy WHO water quality requirements. A sustainable wastewater treatment solution is provided by the combination of both experimental and predictive modelling techniques, which yield important insights into adsorption mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.