Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40320399›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Predegenerating donor nerve for grafting using focused ultrasound neurotomy.

Tak-Ho Chu, Nicolas Lasaleta, Siyun Li, Amanda McConnachie, Leonardo Molina, Saud Alzahrani, Laura Curiel, Samuel Pichardo, Rajiv Midha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tak-Ho Chu *Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Nicolas Lasaleta *Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Siyun Li *Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Amanda McConnachieDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Leonardo MolinaCSM optogenetics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Saud AlzahraniDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Laura CurielHotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Samuel PichardoDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Rajiv MidhaDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. Rajiv.midha@ahs.ca.

Funding

Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary 10039841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early experimental evidence suggests that predegenerated nerve graft enhance axonal growth compared to freshly harvested nerve graft in nerve gap repair. However, the practicality of surgically pre-conditioning nerves for grafting remains a major obstacle. Herein, we aim to investigate the feasibility of focal lesioning of nerve tissue using high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and compare the regenerative effects of predegenerated nerve grafts to freshly harvested grafts in a rat sciatic nerve transection and repair model. As a proof of principle, sciatic nerves were exposed for HIFU lesioning to increase targeting accuracy. HIFU induced focal thermal lesioning to the sciatic nerve, resulting in p75 and cJun up-regulation at the distal segment observed at 7 days post-sonication. All behavioural outcome metrics including von Frey sensory test and walking gait were similar between animals with freshly harvested and predegenerated nerve grafts except soleus muscle weight was significantly higher in the latter group. As well, similar axon histomorphometric results were found in 2-week survival animals. Our findings showed that it is possible to induce Wallerian degeneration in distal nerve for grafting using non-invasive HIFU. However, limited beneficial effects of predegenerated grafts were obtained compared to freshly harvested grafts in nerve gap repair.

Indexed as

High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound AblationNerve RegenerationSciatic NerveAnimalsAxonsMaleRatsAutograftBehavioural studiesHIFUMachine learningPredegeneration

Identifiers

PMID40320399
PMCPMC12050296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.