ArticleScientific reports2025
Socio-demographic factors of happiness among young adults in Iran.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to measure the socio-demographic factors of happiness among young adults in Iran. A national cross-sectional study measures socio-demographic factors of happiness among a representative sample of young adults (20-39 years). The mean happiness score in all 13,173 samples was 4.09 out of 6. The results obtained from multiple logistic regression analysis showed a significant association between happiness, age, education, occupation, and income. In contrast, the association between happiness, gender, and the place of living was insignificant. Separate analyses for men and women showed that age, education, occupation, and income still stayed significant for men, but for women, only education, and income were significant. The results of the path analysis indicated that income was a predictor for happiness (ß = ± 0.09). However, the model explained about 1.5% of the variance observed (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.