Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40320291›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2025

The dialysis foot- the impact of presenting estimated glomerular filtration rate on clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized with diabetic foot infections.

Arthur Tarricone, Tyler L Coye, Allen Gee, Bijan Najafi, Michael C Siah, Lawrence A Lavery

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arthur TarriconeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5311-6283
Tyler L CoyeMichael E DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Allen GeeNova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Davie, Florida, USA.
Bijan NajafiMichael E DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Michael C SiahDepartment of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Lawrence A LaveryDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the association between presenting estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized with diabetic foot infections. This retrospective cohort study included 344 patients with moderate to severe diabetic foot infections. Patients were categorized into three groups based on presenting estimated eGFR: eGFR ≥60 (eGFR >60 mL/min), eGFR 30-60 (eGFR 30-60 mL/min) and eGFR <30 (eGFR <30 mL/min). Outcomes assessed included wound healing, time to heal, re-infection, amputation, mortality and re-hospitalization for infection. Compared with patients with eGFR <30, patients with eGFR ≥60 had significantly lower rates of retinopathy, peripheral arterial disease and use of beta blockers or calcium channel blockers. Glycated haemoglobin levels were inversely related to eGFR, decreasing as eGFR severity increased. Haemoglobin levels were significantly lower, and inflammatory markers (ESR and CRP) were significantly higher in patients with eGFR <30. There were no significant differences among eGFR groups in rates of wound healing, time to heal, re-infection or amputation. However, mortality increased with decreasing eGFR (1.9% in eGFR ≥60 vs. 3.2% in eGFR 30-60 vs. 8.1% in eGFR <30; p = 0.04). Similarly, re-hospitalization for infection at a different site also increased with decreasing eGFR (20.5% in eGFR ≥60 vs. 28.1% in eGFR 30-60 vs. 48.4% in eGFR <30; p < 0.01). In diabetic foot infections, presenting eGFR severity did not affect rates of wound healing, time to heal, re-infection or amputation. However, decreasing eGFR was associated with increased mortality and re-hospitalization for infection at a different site. In this study, presenting eGFR was not a predictive value for wound healing or time until healing, however was associated with rehospitalization and overall mortality this diabetic foot population.

Indexed as

Diabetic FootGlomerular Filtration RateWound HealingAgedAged, 80 and overAmputation, SurgicalCohort StudiesFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studieschronic kidney diseasediabetic foot infectioneGFRfootosteomyelitis

Identifiers

PMID40320291
PMCPMC12050157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.